11.2. Lesson: Web Feature Services¶
A Web Feature Service (WFS) provides its users with GIS data in formats that can be loaded directly in QGIS. Unlike a WMS, which provides you only with a map which you can’t edit, a WFS gives you access to the features themselves.
The goal for this lesson: To use a WFS and understand how it differs from a WMS.
11.2.1. Follow Along: Loading a WFS Layer¶
Start a new map. This is for demo purposes and won’t be saved.
Ensure that “on the fly” re-projection is switched off.
Click the Add WFS Layer button:
Click the New button.
In the dialog that appears, enter the Name as
nsidc.organd the URL as
Click OK, and the new connection will appear in your Server connections.
Click the Connect. A list of the available layers will appear:
Find the layer south_poles_wfs.
Click on the layer to select it:
It may take a while to load the layer. When it has loaded, it will appear in the map. Here it is over the outlines of Antarctica (available on the same server, and by the name of antarctica_country_border):
How is this different from having a WMS layer? That will become obvious when you see the layers’ attributes.
Open the south_poles_wfs layer’s attribute table. You should see this:
Since the points have attributes, we are able to label them, as well as change their symbology. Here’s an example:
Add labels to your layer to take advantage of the attribute data in this layer.
188.8.131.52. Differences from WMS layers¶
A Web Feature Service returns the layer itself, not just a map rendered from it. This gives you direct access to the data, meaning that you can change its symbology and run analysis functions on it. However, this is at the cost of much more data being transmitted. This will be especially obvious if the layers you’re loading have complicated shapes, a lot of attributes, or many features; or even if you’re just loading a lot of layers. WFS layers typically take a very long time to load because of this.
11.2.2. Follow Along: Querying a WFS Layer¶
Although it is of possible to query a WFS layer after having loaded it, it’s often more efficient to query it before you load it. That way, you’re only requesting the features you want, meaning that you use far less bandwidth.
For example, on the WFS server we’re currently using, there is a layer called countries (excluding Antarctica). Let’s say that we want to know where South Africa is relative to the south_poles_wfs layer (and perhaps also the antarctica_country_border layer) that’s already been loaded.
There are two ways to do this. You can load the whole countries … layer, and then build a query as usual once it’s loaded. However, transmitting the data for all the countries in the world and then only using the data for South Africa seems a bit wasteful of bandwidth. Depending on your connection, this dataset can take several minutes to load.
The alternative is to build the query as a filter before even loading the layer from the server.
In the Add WFS Layer … dialog, connect to the server we used before and you should see the list of available layers.
Double-click next to the countries … layer in the Filter field, or click Build query:
In the dialog that appears, build the query "Countryeng" = 'South Africa':
It will appear as the Filter value:
Click Add with the countries layer selected as above. Only the country with the Countryeng value of South Africa will load from that layer:
You don’t have to, but if you tried both methods, you’ll notice that this is a lot faster than loading all the countries before filtering them!
184.108.40.206. Notes on WFS availability¶
It is rare to find a WFS hosting features you need, if your needs are very specific. The reason why Web Feature Services are relatively rare is because of the large amounts of data that must be transmitted to describe a whole feature. It is therefore not very cost-effective to host a WFS rather than a WMS, which sends only images.
The most common type of WFS you’ll encounter will therefore probably be on a local network or even on your own computer, rather than on the Internet.
11.2.3. In Conclusion¶
WFS layers are preferable over WMS layers if you need direct access to the attributes and geometries of the layers. However, considering the amount of data that needs to be downloaded (which leads to speed problems and also a lack of easily available public WFS servers) it’s not always possible to use a WFS instead of a WMS.
11.2.4. What’s Next?¶
Next, you’ll see how to use QGIS Server to provide OGC services.